Stablecoins
A stablecoin is a promise that one token equals one dollar. The market price tells you what people think of the promise - which is why a depeg is a credit event, not a price move.
At a glance
- What it is
- A token redeemable for one US dollar, issued against a reserve
- Total supply
- Roughly a quarter of a trillion dollars across all issuers, 2026 estimate
- Backing
- Mostly short-dated US Treasury bills, repo and bank deposits
- The number that matters
- The redemption price at the issuer, not the exchange print
What the asset actually is
A fiat-backed stablecoin is a claim on an issuer. You give the issuer a dollar, it gives you a token; you return the token, it gives back the dollar. The token trades freely in between, and its price on an exchange reflects the market's confidence in that redemption promise rather than the value of anything intrinsic.
That makes the correct mental model a money-market fund with a blockchain transfer layer, not a currency. The issuer earns interest on the reserve, the holder earns nothing, and the difference is the business. When short-term rates are high, issuing stablecoins is extremely profitable; when they are near zero, the model is much thinner.
There is a second family worth separating out. Algorithmic or crypto-collateralised designs hold no equivalent dollar reserve, maintaining the peg through incentives or over-collateralisation in volatile assets. The 2022 collapse of one such design destroyed tens of billions of dollars in days, and the distinction between the two families is the single most important thing to establish before pricing any stablecoin question.
The peg is a credit question. A depeg is the market pricing doubt about redemption, not a trade about value.
What they are used for
The dominant use is as the quote asset of crypto trading. Most order books are denominated in a dollar stablecoin rather than in dollars, because a token settles in seconds and a bank wire does not. That alone accounts for the majority of stablecoin transfer volume.
The second use is dollar access outside the US banking system. In economies with capital controls or high inflation, a dollar-denominated token that moves on a phone is a savings product, and this demand is largely insensitive to crypto market cycles - a structural floor under supply that did not exist a decade ago.
Third is on-chain finance: collateral for lending, the settlement leg of decentralised exchange trades, and treasury management for crypto-native businesses. Fourth, and growing, is straightforward payments: remittances, supplier settlement and payroll where the alternative is slow, expensive or unavailable.
- Exchange trading and settlement
- 52%
- On-chain finance and collateral
- 18%
- Transfers, remittances and savingsLargest in economies with restricted dollar access
- 17%
- Business and payroll payments
- 8%
- Everything else
- 5%
Source: On-chain estimates
Who issues them and what backs them
The market is concentrated. Two issuers account for the large majority of dollar stablecoin supply, with the remainder split across bank-issued tokens, exchange-issued tokens and decentralised designs. That concentration is itself a systemic fact: a problem at either of the two would not stay contained.
The reserves behind the largest tokens are, in the main, short-dated US Treasury bills, overnight repurchase agreements and bank deposits. This makes the largest issuers meaningful buyers of Treasury bills - a rare case of a crypto structure with a direct footprint in a government bond market.
Verification is by attestation, not by audit, and the distinction matters. An attestation reports balances at a point in time under agreed procedures; a full audit tests the controls that produce them. Regulatory frameworks in the US and the EU have tightened requirements considerably since 2024, but published reserve reporting remains less rigorous than a regulated fund's.
- Two issuers hold the large majority of dollar stablecoin supply.
- Reserves are mostly Treasury bills, repo and cash deposits at commercial banks.
- Attestations are periodic and procedural - not the same as an audit.
- The EU framework has applied to stablecoins since 2024; a US federal framework was enacted in 2025.
| Name | Share |
|---|---|
| Largest issuerOffshore, attested quarterly | 62share of dollar stablecoin supply |
| Second issuerUS-regulated, attested monthly | 25share of dollar stablecoin supply |
| Bank and exchange issued tokens | 7share of dollar stablecoin supply |
| Crypto-collateralised designs | 6share of dollar stablecoin supply |
Source: Issuer disclosures and on-chain supply
Behind the subscription
The rest of this entry is the part that changes a decision: what moves the price, which contract sets it, who ships it and where that can be cut off.
What breaks a peg
Six failure modes, ranked - and the one that has actually caused every major fiat-backed depeg so far.
Where they trade and where they are redeemed
The two prices that exist at once - the exchange print and the issuer's redemption window - and why only one of them settles a question.
Where the supply lives
Which chains carry the balances, why one network dominates transfers by count, and what that means for a question about supply.
How this shows up in prediction markets
Depeg thresholds, supply milestones and regulatory dates - and the resolution wording that decides all three.
Included with a subscription
Create an account to unlock the full entry — price drivers, trading venues, trade flows and the live markets attached to it.
Frequently asked questions
- What actually causes a stablecoin to lose its peg?
- For fiat-backed tokens, doubt about reaching the reserve rather than doubt that it exists. The 2023 episode was caused by reserve deposits sitting at a failed bank; the token recovered fully once the deposits were made whole. For algorithmic designs, the cause is reflexive: falling price destroys the backing that supports the price.
- Are stablecoin reserves audited?
- Mostly attested, not audited. An attestation reports balances at a point in time under agreed procedures; an audit tests the controls behind them. Requirements have tightened under the EU framework since 2024 and the US framework enacted in 2025, but reporting is still lighter than for a regulated money-market fund.
- Why do issuers make money and holders do not?
- The issuer holds the reserve and keeps the interest it earns; the holder gets a token that pays nothing. At high short-term rates this is an extremely profitable business, which is why issuance grew fastest when rates were high and why rate cuts are a business risk rather than a peg risk.
- Does a brief dip below a dollar count as a depeg?
- That depends entirely on the market's wording, which is why it should be the first thing you read. A single print below the threshold on one exchange is a very different event from a sustained gap that redemption cannot close, and a question that does not distinguish them is not one worth taking a side on.
Primary sources
Related entries
Prediction markets carry real risk of loss. Nothing on Market Guy is financial advice — it is research tooling to help you think, not a signal to trade.